Similar and Alternative 3D Printers to Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
Categories- Pros 👍Enclosed Printing Chamber, Dual Extruder Capability, Sturdy Metal Frame, Large Build Volume, Dual Extruder, Enclosed Design and Enclosed ChamberPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎100 µm 🟢Cons 👎Heavy And Bulky, Limited Community Support, Heavy and Steep Learning CurvePrint Quality 🎨8.5Ease of Use 💻8 🟢Reliability 🔨8.5 🟢🔎 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔨 is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T⭐ is rated higher than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Huge Build Volume, Direct Drive Extruder, Affordable Price, Large Build Volume and Quiet OperationPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 500Build Volume 📏300 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎100 µm 🟢Cons 👎Long Heating Time, Requires Large Space, Long Heating Times For Large Prints and Assembly RequiredPrint Quality 🎨8Ease of Use 💻7.5 🟢Reliability 🔨8📏 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔎 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Large Build Volume, Enclosed Chamber and Versatile Material CompatibilityPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏270 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µmCons 👎Inconsistent Customer Support & Heavy And BulkyPrint Quality 🎨8Ease of Use 💻8.5 🟢Reliability 🔨7.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Large Build Volume, Stable Cube Frame and Dual Z-AxisPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎100 µm 🟢Cons 👎Long Heating Time For Large Bed & Requires Some AssemblyPrint Quality 🎨8Ease of Use 💻7.5 🟢Reliability 🔨8🔎 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Ultra-Fast Printing Speeds, Multi-Material Capability, Advanced AI Features, High-Speed Printing, Auto Material Switching, Extremely Fast Printing, AI Monitoring and AI-AssistedPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1500Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎50 µmCons 👎Expensive, Requires Proprietary Filament For Full Features, Expensive For Hobbyists, New Brand With Limited Track Record, High Price and Limited Community SupportPrint Quality 🎨9 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5 🟢Reliability 🔨9 🟢🎨 produces higher quality prints than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔨 is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💰 is more durable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T⭐ is rated higher than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Infinite Z-Axis Printing, Conveyor Belt Bed and Batch Production CapablePrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎100 µm 🟢Cons 👎Requires Special Slicing Software & Limited Material CompatibilityPrint Quality 🎨8Ease of Use 💻7Reliability 🔨8.5 🟢🔎 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔨 is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Independent Dual Extruder, High Precision, Large Build Volume and Independent Dual Extruder SystemPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏420 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µmCons 👎Expensive, Steep Learning Curve and Steep Learning Curve For Advanced FeaturesPrint Quality 🎨9 🟢Ease of Use 💻7.5 🟢Reliability 🔨8.5 🟢📏 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🎨 produces higher quality prints than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔨 is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💰 is more durable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T⭐ is rated higher than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍High-Quality Prints, User-Friendly, Large Community Support, Reliable, Open-Source and Great Community SupportPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏250 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µmCons 👎Noisy Operation, Requires Some Assembly, Slightly Pricier Than Competitors and Assembly Required For Kit VersionPrint Quality 🎨9.2 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5 🟢Reliability 🔨9.5 🟢📏 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🎨 produces higher quality prints than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔨 is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💰 is more durable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T⭐ is rated higher than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Large Build Volume, Direct Drive Extruder and Silent OperationPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 500Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎100 µm 🟢Cons 👎Manual Bed Leveling, Limited Cooling For Large Prints and Limited Customer SupportPrint Quality 🎨8Ease of Use 💻8.5 🟢Reliability 🔨7.5🔎 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Pros 👍Low Cost, Easy To Upgrade, Large Community and Large Community SupportPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 500Build Volume 📏220 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎100 µm 🟢Cons 👎Manual Bed Leveling, Limited Build Volume and Noisy OperationPrint Quality 🎨7.8Ease of Use 💻7.5 🟢Reliability 🔨8📏 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T🔎 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T💻 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
- Qidi Tech X-Max
- The printing technology of Qidi Tech X-Max is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Qidi Tech X-Max is 849 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Qidi Tech X-Max.
- The build volume of Qidi Tech X-Max is null mm³. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same build volume as Qidi Tech X-Max.
- The minimum print resolution of Qidi Tech X-Max is 100 µm. 👍 Qidi Tech X-Max has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The print quality score for Qidi Tech X-Max is 8.5. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces the same quality prints as Qidi Tech X-Max.
- The ease of use score for Qidi Tech X-Max is 8. 👍 Qidi Tech X-Max is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Qidi Tech X-Max is 8.5. 👍 Qidi Tech X-Max is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- Creality CR-10 V3
- The printing technology of Creality CR-10 V3 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Creality CR-10 V3 is 479 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Creality CR-10 V3.
- The build volume of Creality CR-10 V3 is 300 mm³. 👍 Creality CR-10 V3 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The minimum print resolution of Creality CR-10 V3 is 100 µm. 👍 Creality CR-10 V3 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The print quality score for Creality CR-10 V3 is 8. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces higher quality prints than Creality CR-10 V3.
- The ease of use score for Creality CR-10 V3 is 7.5. 👍 Creality CR-10 V3 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Creality CR-10 V3 is 8. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is as reliable as Creality CR-10 V3.
- QIDI Tech X-Plus
- The printing technology of QIDI Tech X-Plus is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of QIDI Tech X-Plus is 699 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than QIDI Tech X-Plus.
- The build volume of QIDI Tech X-Plus is 270 mm³. 👍 QIDI Tech X-Plus has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The minimum print resolution of QIDI Tech X-Plus is 50 µm. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same resolution as QIDI Tech X-Plus.
- The print quality score for QIDI Tech X-Plus is 8. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces higher quality prints than QIDI Tech X-Plus.
- The ease of use score for QIDI Tech X-Plus is 8.5. 👍 QIDI Tech X-Plus is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for QIDI Tech X-Plus is 7.5. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more reliable than QIDI Tech X-Plus.
- Creality Ender 5 Plus
- The printing technology of Creality Ender 5 Plus is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Creality Ender 5 Plus is 569 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Creality Ender 5 Plus.
- The build volume of Creality Ender 5 Plus is null mm³. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same build volume as Creality Ender 5 Plus.
- The minimum print resolution of Creality Ender 5 Plus is 100 µm. 👍 Creality Ender 5 Plus has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The print quality score for Creality Ender 5 Plus is 8. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces higher quality prints than Creality Ender 5 Plus.
- The ease of use score for Creality Ender 5 Plus is 7.5. 👍 Creality Ender 5 Plus is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Creality Ender 5 Plus is 8. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is as reliable as Creality Ender 5 Plus.
- Bambu Lab X1 Carbon
- The printing technology of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 1449 USD. 👍 Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is more affordable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The build volume of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is null mm³. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same build volume as Bambu Lab X1 Carbon.
- The minimum print resolution of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 50 µm. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same resolution as Bambu Lab X1 Carbon.
- The print quality score for Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 9. 👍 Bambu Lab X1 Carbon produces higher quality prints than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The ease of use score for Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 8.5. 👍 Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 9. 👍 Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- Creality CR-30 PrintMill
- The printing technology of Creality CR-30 PrintMill is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Creality CR-30 PrintMill is 999 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Creality CR-30 PrintMill.
- The build volume of Creality CR-30 PrintMill is null mm³. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same build volume as Creality CR-30 PrintMill.
- The minimum print resolution of Creality CR-30 PrintMill is 100 µm. 👍 Creality CR-30 PrintMill has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The print quality score for Creality CR-30 PrintMill is 8. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces higher quality prints than Creality CR-30 PrintMill.
- The ease of use score for Creality CR-30 PrintMill is 7. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is as easy to use as Creality CR-30 PrintMill.
- The reliability score for Creality CR-30 PrintMill is 8.5. 👍 Creality CR-30 PrintMill is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- BCN3D Sigma D25
- The printing technology of BCN3D Sigma D25 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 3995 USD. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 is more affordable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The build volume of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 420 mm³. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The minimum print resolution of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 50 µm. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same resolution as BCN3D Sigma D25.
- The print quality score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 9. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 produces higher quality prints than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The ease of use score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 7.5. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 8.5. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- Prusa I3 MK3S+
- The printing technology of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 749 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The build volume of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 250 mm³. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The minimum print resolution of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 50 µm. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same resolution as Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The print quality score for Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9.2. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ produces higher quality prints than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The ease of use score for Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 8.5. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9.5. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ is more reliable than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- Artillery Sidewinder X2
- The printing technology of Artillery Sidewinder X2 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Artillery Sidewinder X2 is 399 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Artillery Sidewinder X2.
- The build volume of Artillery Sidewinder X2 is null mm³. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T has the same build volume as Artillery Sidewinder X2.
- The minimum print resolution of Artillery Sidewinder X2 is 100 µm. 👍 Artillery Sidewinder X2 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The print quality score for Artillery Sidewinder X2 is 8. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces higher quality prints than Artillery Sidewinder X2.
- The ease of use score for Artillery Sidewinder X2 is 8.5. 👍 Artillery Sidewinder X2 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Artillery Sidewinder X2 is 7.5. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more reliable than Artillery Sidewinder X2.
- Creality Ender 3 V2
- The printing technology of Creality Ender 3 V2 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Creality Ender 3 V2 is 279 USD. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is more affordable than Creality Ender 3 V2.
- The build volume of Creality Ender 3 V2 is 220 mm³. 👍 Creality Ender 3 V2 has a smaller build volume than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The minimum print resolution of Creality Ender 3 V2 is 100 µm. 👍 Creality Ender 3 V2 has a higher resolution than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The print quality score for Creality Ender 3 V2 is 7.8. 👎 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T produces higher quality prints than Creality Ender 3 V2.
- The ease of use score for Creality Ender 3 V2 is 7.5. 👍 Creality Ender 3 V2 is easier to use than Snapmaker 2.0 A350T.
- The reliability score for Creality Ender 3 V2 is 8. 👉 Snapmaker 2.0 A350T is as reliable as Creality Ender 3 V2.