Similar and Alternative 3D Printers to Ultimaker S3
Categories- Pros 👍Dual Extrusion, Large Build Volume, High Precision, Dual Extrusion Capability and Enclosed Build ChamberPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 10000Build Volume 📏330 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎Expensive, Large Footprint and Very ExpensivePrint Quality 🎨9.8 🟢Ease of Use 💻9Reliability 🔨9.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3💰 is more durable than Ultimaker S3⭐ is rated higher than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Large Build Volume, Advanced Material Compatibility, Air Filtration System, Dual Extrusion, Material Station, High-Quality Prints, Enclosed Build Chamber and Advanced Material ManagementPrinting Technology 💡FFFMax Price 💲Under $10000Build Volume 📏330 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎Very Expensive, Steep Learning Curve, Expensive and Limited To Proprietary MaterialsPrint Quality 🎨9.8 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3⭐ is rated higher than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍High-Temperature Printing, Soluble Supports, Precision, Heated Chamber, Cloud-Connected, Circulating Heated Chamber, Dual Extrusion and High PrecisionPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 10000Build Volume 📏190 mm³Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎Very Expensive, Proprietary Materials, Expensive, Limited To Makerbot Materials and Small Build Volume For The PricePrint Quality 🎨9.5 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Huge Build Volume, Dual Extrusion and High PrecisionPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏305 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎10 µmCons 👎Expensive & HeavyPrint Quality 🎨9.2 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Excellent Print Quality, User-Friendly Interface and Large Community SupportPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Higher Price Point Compared To Budget Options & Limited Build Volume For Large ProjectsPrint Quality 🎨9.5 🟢Ease of Use 💻9Reliability 🔨9.5🔎 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Independent Dual Extruder, High Precision, Large Build Volume and Independent Dual Extruder SystemPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏420 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Expensive, Steep Learning Curve and Steep Learning Curve For Advanced FeaturesPrint Quality 🎨9Ease of Use 💻7.5Reliability 🔨8.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🔎 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Huge Build Volume, Multi-Material Capability and High ReliabilityPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 2000Build Volume 📏360 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎High Price & Long Lead TimesPrint Quality 🎨9.5 🟢Ease of Use 💻8Reliability 🔨9.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🔎 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍High-Quality Prints, User-Friendly, Large Community Support, Reliable, Open-Source and Great Community SupportPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1000Build Volume 📏250 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Noisy Operation, Requires Some Assembly, Slightly Pricier Than Competitors and Assembly Required For Kit VersionPrint Quality 🎨9.2 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🔎 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3🎨 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Open Source, Durable Construction, Wide Material Compatibility, Large Build Volume, Open Source Design and Versatile Material CompatibilityPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏280 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Expensive, Noisy Operation and Loud OperationPrint Quality 🎨8.5Ease of Use 💻7.5Reliability 🔨9.5📏 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3🔎 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3💰 is more durable than Ultimaker S3
- Pros 👍Enclosed Chamber With HEPA Filter, High Reliability, Educational Resources, User-Friendly, Enclosed Design, Reliable Performance, Reliable, Easy To Use and HEPA FilterPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 2000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Expensive, Limited Build Volume For Price, Limited Material Options, Expensive Proprietary Filaments and Limited Build VolumePrint Quality 🎨8.5Ease of Use 💻9.5 🟢Reliability 🔨9.5🔎 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3💻 is easier to use than Ultimaker S3
- Ultimaker S5
- The printing technology of Ultimaker S5 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Ultimaker S5 is 5995 USD. 👍 Ultimaker S5 is more affordable than Ultimaker S3.
- The build volume of Ultimaker S5 is 330 mm³. 👍 Ultimaker S5 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of Ultimaker S5 is 20 µm. 👉 Ultimaker S3 has the same resolution as Ultimaker S5.
- The print quality score for Ultimaker S5 is 9.8. 👍 Ultimaker S5 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for Ultimaker S5 is 9. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as easy to use as Ultimaker S5.
- The reliability score for Ultimaker S5 is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as Ultimaker S5.
- Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle
- The printing technology of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is FFF. 👍 undefined.
- The price of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 9550 USD. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is more affordable than Ultimaker S3.
- The build volume of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 330 mm³. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 20 µm. 👉 Ultimaker S3 has the same resolution as Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle.
- The print quality score for Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 9.8. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle.
- The reliability score for Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle.
- MakerBot Method X
- The printing technology of MakerBot Method X is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of MakerBot Method X is 6499 USD. 👍 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Ultimaker S3.
- The build volume of MakerBot Method X is 190 mm³. 👎 Ultimaker S3 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X.
- The minimum print resolution of MakerBot Method X is 20 µm. 👉 Ultimaker S3 has the same resolution as MakerBot Method X.
- The print quality score for MakerBot Method X is 9.5. 👍 MakerBot Method X produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for MakerBot Method X is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X.
- The reliability score for MakerBot Method X is 9. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X.
- Raise3D Pro2
- The printing technology of Raise3D Pro2 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Raise3D Pro2 is 3999 USD. 👍 Raise3D Pro2 is more affordable than Ultimaker S3.
- The build volume of Raise3D Pro2 is 305 mm³. 👍 Raise3D Pro2 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of Raise3D Pro2 is 10 µm. 👎 Ultimaker S3 has a higher resolution than Raise3D Pro2.
- The print quality score for Raise3D Pro2 is 9.2. 👍 Raise3D Pro2 produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for Raise3D Pro2 is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than Raise3D Pro2.
- The reliability score for Raise3D Pro2 is 9. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more reliable than Raise3D Pro2.
- Original Prusa I3 MK3S+
- The printing technology of Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 749 USD. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more affordable than Original Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The build volume of Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is null mm³. 👎 Ultimaker S3 has a smaller build volume than Original Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The minimum print resolution of Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 50 µm. 👍 Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3.
- The print quality score for Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9.5. 👍 Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as easy to use as Original Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The reliability score for Original Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as Original Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- BCN3D Sigma D25
- The printing technology of BCN3D Sigma D25 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 3995 USD. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 is more affordable than Ultimaker S3.
- The build volume of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 420 mm³. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 50 µm. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3.
- The print quality score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 9. 👉 Ultimaker S3 produces the same quality prints as BCN3D Sigma D25.
- The ease of use score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 7.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than BCN3D Sigma D25.
- The reliability score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more reliable than BCN3D Sigma D25.
- Prusa XL
- The printing technology of Prusa XL is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Prusa XL is 1999 USD. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more affordable than Prusa XL.
- The build volume of Prusa XL is 360 mm³. 👍 Prusa XL has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of Prusa XL is 50 µm. 👍 Prusa XL has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3.
- The print quality score for Prusa XL is 9.5. 👍 Prusa XL produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for Prusa XL is 8. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than Prusa XL.
- The reliability score for Prusa XL is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as Prusa XL.
- Prusa I3 MK3S+
- The printing technology of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 749 USD. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more affordable than Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The build volume of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 250 mm³. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 50 µm. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3.
- The print quality score for Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9.2. 👍 Prusa i3 MK3S+ produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3.
- The ease of use score for Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- The reliability score for Prusa i3 MK3S+ is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as Prusa i3 MK3S+.
- LulzBot TAZ Workhorse
- The printing technology of LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is 2950 USD. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more affordable than LulzBot TAZ Workhorse.
- The build volume of LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is 280 mm³. 👍 LulzBot TAZ Workhorse has a smaller build volume than Ultimaker S3.
- The minimum print resolution of LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is 50 µm. 👍 LulzBot TAZ Workhorse has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3.
- The print quality score for LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 produces higher quality prints than LulzBot TAZ Workhorse.
- The ease of use score for LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is 7.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than LulzBot TAZ Workhorse.
- The reliability score for LulzBot TAZ Workhorse is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as LulzBot TAZ Workhorse.
- Dremel DigiLab 3D45
- The printing technology of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is FDM. 👉 undefined.
- The price of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 1799 USD. 👎 Ultimaker S3 is more affordable than Dremel DigiLab 3D45.
- The build volume of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is null mm³. 👎 Ultimaker S3 has a smaller build volume than Dremel DigiLab 3D45.
- The minimum print resolution of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 50 µm. 👍 Dremel DigiLab 3D45 has a higher resolution than Ultimaker S3.
- The print quality score for Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 8.5. 👎 Ultimaker S3 produces higher quality prints than Dremel DigiLab 3D45.
- The ease of use score for Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 9.5. 👍 Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is easier to use than Ultimaker S3.
- The reliability score for Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 9.5. 👉 Ultimaker S3 is as reliable as Dremel DigiLab 3D45.